Ethics

Publication Ethics Policy

Sciencevio follows transparent editorial procedures for authorship, peer review, conflicts, research ethics, corrections, complaints, and publication record integrity.

Ethics Publication Ethics Policy

Overview

Publication ethics policies support accuracy, transparency, accountability, and correction of the scholarly record.

Core expectations

Authors, reviewers, editors, and conference contributors share responsibility for ethical scholarly communication.

  • Submit original work and cite sources accurately.
  • Disclose funding, conflicts, authorship contributions, and AI tool use where relevant.
  • Provide ethics approval, consent, trial registration, and data information when applicable.
  • Avoid fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, duplicate publication, citation manipulation, and misleading reporting.

Concern handling

When concerns arise, editors assess evidence and may request documentation before taking action.

  • Authors may be asked for source data, approvals, or explanations.
  • Institutions or ethics bodies may be contacted for serious concerns.
  • Published articles may receive corrections, expressions of concern, or retractions.
  • Readers and authors may use complaint and appeal routes for documented concerns.

How this page is used

This information supports authors, reviewers, editors, conference contributors, and readers by making the Sciencevio publishing route clear before submission and consistent after publication.

Before submission

Use the policy to prepare declarations, files, permissions, ethics details, and journal or conference fit.

During review

Editors and reviewers use the policy to keep decisions consistent, documented, confidential, and independent.

After publication

Corrections, reuse, metadata, archiving, complaints, and record updates are handled according to the published policy route.