Appeals

Complaints and Appeals

Authors, reviewers, readers, and editors may raise complaints or appeal editorial decisions through a documented route.

Appeals Complaints and Appeals

Overview

The complaints and appeals route gives authors, reviewers, readers, and editors a documented way to request review of decisions or process concerns.

Submitting a complaint or appeal

A useful appeal provides precise evidence rather than a general disagreement with editorial judgement.

  • Include manuscript ID, journal title, decision date, and clear reason for appeal.
  • Identify procedural errors, overlooked evidence, conflict concerns, or factual inaccuracies.
  • Provide supporting documents without abusive or defamatory language.
  • Send publication ethics concerns to the editorial office with relevant evidence.

Review process

Appeals are reviewed by an editor or advisor not directly responsible for the original decision where possible.

  • The original decision may be upheld, revised, or sent for further review.
  • Complaints about conduct may trigger internal review or external consultation.
  • Repeated unsupported appeals may be closed after explanation.
  • Outcomes are communicated with a concise reasoned response.

How this page is used

This information supports authors, reviewers, editors, conference contributors, and readers by making the Sciencevio publishing route clear before submission and consistent after publication.

Before submission

Use the policy to prepare declarations, files, permissions, ethics details, and journal or conference fit.

During review

Editors and reviewers use the policy to keep decisions consistent, documented, confidential, and independent.

After publication

Corrections, reuse, metadata, archiving, complaints, and record updates are handled according to the published policy route.